Which of the following best describes the role of documentary evidence?

The role of documentary evidence is best described as providing tangible, verifiable records. This type of evidence includes documents such as contracts, leases, business records, and written statements, which can be crucial in supporting claims made in court. The primary strength of documentary evidence lies in its ability to present specifics in a clear format that can be objectively assessed by legal professionals, judges, and juries. Because it is in a physical form, it can also be authenticated, meaning its origins and authenticity can be tracked and verified, making it a cornerstone of factual analysis in legal proceedings.

In contrast, options that suggest limitations or weaknesses in documentary evidence do not accurately reflect its significance. For instance, stating it cannot be presented in court contradicts the fundamental principles of evidence law, as documentary evidence is routinely utilized to substantiate claims. Similarly, characterizing it as a secondary source undermines its primary role in providing direct evidence of facts. Lastly, saying it is based on verbal accounts misrepresents its nature, as documentary evidence is fundamentally different from oral testimony and relies on written form rather than spoken words.